|
Author
|
Topic: Wool Thread Sources?
|
13thCRenMan
Member
Member # 226
|
posted 06-18-2002 03:14 PM
Hello!Where does one buy wool thread -- for regular clothes, and more heavy-duty for sewing gambesons? I handsew clothes, but I want to machine the gambeson; would the thread be strong enough to run through a sewing machine? Thank you!! David
Registered: Oct 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
hauptmann
unregistered
|
posted 06-18-2002 05:07 PM
I'm curious why you want to use wool thread.I've been under the impression that linen was the fibre of choice for stitching. That and possibly silk.
IP: Logged
|
|
Nikki
Member
Member # 27
|
posted 06-18-2002 11:30 PM
IIRC, _Textile Production at 22 Coppergate_ claims that in the early medieval period, wool thread was used on wool garments, silk thread on silk garments, and linen thread on linen garments, and that the use of linen thread on wool garments became prevalent somewhere in the middle of the medieval period. I haven't got the book here with me, so I can't give a specific quote here, or tell if it noted when this changeover occurred (i'm on vacation, and won't be able to check for a while, unfortunately).Wool embroidery thread for crewel embroidery is sold in some needlework stores, but it is not very strong, and tends to fray badly, and I would not trust it for garment construction. I have never seen wool spun fine enough and strong enough to use as thread, since most spun wool is used for knitting or embroidery, not sewing. You almost certainly would not be able to use any wool thread in a sewing machine (imho), linen thread also does not work in the machine. Silk thread, tho, sews beautifully in the machine, especially on woolens.
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
13thCRenMan
Member
Member # 226
|
posted 06-19-2002 03:11 PM
Hello! quote: Originally posted by Nikki: Silk thread, tho, sews beautifully in the machine, especially on woolens.
Seems that might be the way to go, then. Do you know what thickness would be best for a gambeson -- just the thickest I can find? Also, how is thickness/strength depicted on the spool? Thank you! David
Registered: Oct 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
AnnaRidley
Member
Member # 97
|
posted 06-19-2002 11:01 PM
Crowfoot (MOL Textiles and Clothing) indicates that silk and linen were the predominant fibers used for sewing thread in the latter middle ages. In particular: "Silk thread can also be found used upon woolen cloth, not only for ornamental purposes but also for buttonholes, hems, and seams. The preponderance of lost stitching among the London textile remains suggests that linen thread was usually used for the main seams, whereas the more expensive silk thread was probably reserved for visible and decorative stiching. ... "Wool thread was also used to sew garments in the middle ages. A practice of considerable antiquity and one which appears to have been normal on wool clothing worn in London, and also in York, during the 10th and 11th century, there is little documentary evidence for it in 14th century London. It would seem that by this time linen and silk threads predominated -- at least, that is the impression one gets from the fragments. There can be little doubt that the use of wool sewing thread must still have been widespread in the lower classes of society and it is this type of thread that was used on the 14th century garments from Herjolfsnes, Greenland which was a farming community." (pg. 152)I didn't find any thing in Textile Production but the following section comes from Textiles, Cordage, and Raw Fibre from 16-22 Coppergate (AY 17/5): "The sewing thread of these hems and seams for the most part matches the fibre of the fabric being stitched, ... however, in some cases linen has been used on silk ... "The silk is of course finer than the other sewing yarns 0.3-0.8mm, and the stitching closer together, 4-6 stiches per cm. The linen plied threads are also mainly fine, 0.4-1.0mm diameter and 3-5 stitches per cm, but wool yarns are 0.8-1.5mm diamter and 1-3 stitches per cm. There was usually too little of the sewing thread to allow a dye test, but it is apparent that occasionally they were dyed, sometimes in a different colour from the ground weave." (pp 408-9) In terms of finding sources for thread. Things Japanese sells pretty much the entire range of Tire threads from Japan. They also have quite a bit of information about the threads and such. With my rather in-exact method of measuring -the machine twist (size 50) is about .25 mm. The buttonhole twist (size 8) is more for handsewing and runs about .7 mm. The line stich (size 30) may be the perfect weight for your application. Another brand of silk thread that can frequently found in up-scale fabric stores is Guttermann. I don't know of any linen or wool sold for use in a machine. Halcyon Yarn sells a 2 ply wool that might be suitable for hand sewing (it runs about .6mm), but it breaks fairly easily and certainly would not hold up to a sewing machine. Based on the figures in AY 17/5 the 2/8 Maine Line wool may also be suitable on the upper end of the thickness scale. Lacis is another place to find threads. Their 35/2 linen is very nice for tablet weaving, finger weaving, and hand sewing and comes in multiple colors. Hope that helps. Mitake.
Registered: Dec 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
Anne-Marie
Member
Member # 8
|
posted 06-20-2002 02:39 AM
www.weavingworks.com carries a wide assortment of threads and fibers.I get all my linen thread there. They also carry wool in various thicknesses as well as silk, hemp and cotton. They also donate wool roving for our demos that we do for schools . hope this helps, --Anne-Marie -------------------- "Let Good Come of It"
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
hauptmann
unregistered
|
posted 06-20-2002 11:26 AM
A couple of things to consider:If you want to make the gambeson as historically accurate as possible and to that end want to use an historically accurate thread for the quilting, wouldn't it make sense to do the quilting by hand? If you plan to quilt by machine, it seems rather unimportant to use an historically accurate thread as the look of the quilting done by machine will negate the use of the type of thread; ie hand qulting looks different than machine stitching in that machines do a lock stitching and most medieval quilting stitches are a running stitch. If you are specifically looking for a thread to quilty a gambeson, silk is perhaps not the best choice, as it degrades quickly with sweat and also sunlight. While it would be strong, I don't think it would last very long in this application. Given that fine wool thread suitable for quilting would not be terribly strong, Linen seems your best choice.
IP: Logged
|
|
13thCRenMan
Member
Member # 226
|
posted 06-20-2002 12:25 PM
NOOOO!! I just typed this and screwed up and it dissappeard!! (and I thought about saving it, too, but didn't...) quote: If you want to make the gambeson as historically accurate as possible and to that end want to use an historically accurate thread for the quilting, wouldn't it make sense to do the quilting by hand?
I'm also using the white fibrous by-the-yard padding, since it's cheaper, cleaner, and easier to use. So using modern stitching won't take away too much more authenticity. Also, since this is my first gambeson, and probably won't turn out too well, I don't want to spend so much time/effort on it by handquilting. After I've made a couple and know exactly what to do, I'll fix the inaccuracies. quote:
If you plan to quilt by machine, it seems rather unimportant to use an historically accurate thread as the look of the quilting done by machine will negate the use of the type of thread.
I figure it's better to use accurate thread and modern construction than modern thread /and/ construction. I'm not willing to handquilt this one, just too much time (and I'm working on chainmail now, too) but if silk won't hold up, I might have to use modern thread. David
Registered: Oct 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
AnnaRidley
Member
Member # 97
|
posted 06-20-2002 01:11 PM
quote: Originally posted by 13thCRenMan: I'm also using the white fibrous by-the-yard padding, since it's cheaper, cleaner, and easier to use. So using modern stitching won't take away too much more authenticity.
If by this you mean poylester quilt batting I have one thing to say. Don't do it. You will lose all of the benefits that you gain from natural fibers. There are a number of 100% cotton battings out there. This will allow your garment to retain the breathability of natural fibers. Here's an eaxmple of a product that I am talking about - you can usually find it at JoAnn's, Hanncock, and Wal-Mart http://shop.store.yahoo.com/hancockfabricstore/cotquilbat.html If you still really want to use linen thread in a sewing machine give one of these from Lacis a try UN31 * Lin, 80/2, 12.5g, bl (Bockens) 9.00 YK03 * Lin, 100/2, 25g, bl 6.50 TH038 Lin, 120/2, 100 yds, nat, bl 4.50 UN32 * Lin, 120/2, 12.5g, bl (Bockens) 11.00 Mitake.
Registered: Dec 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
13thCRenMan
Member
Member # 226
|
posted 06-20-2002 08:41 PM
Hello!I had looked at cotton before, but what I had found didn't look like it would work. I went out tonight and looked again, and while I didn't find the exact brand you linked to it looked the same stuff as the picture. But it was very thin -- it would take maybe 8+ layers to for the padding to be thick enough. Is this the sort of batting you meant? I guess it would just have to be layered, or is there thicker stuff out there? Thanks!! David
Registered: Oct 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|