|
Author
|
Topic: Phoebus and shoes
|
|
|
Fire Stryker
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 2
|
posted 06-10-2001 08:42 AM
Hi Rhys,you have me at a disadvantage in that I have the "Book of the Hunt" but I do not possess Dress Accessories or Shoes and Pattens. Something I keep trying to remedy. Perhaps there are some cordwainers on this forum who can help out. Now bumping message to the top. [bump] Cheers, FS -------------------- ad finem fidelis
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
Rhys
Member
Member # 185
|
posted 06-10-2001 02:44 PM
Hi there, Supposedly the Dress Accessories series from the London Museum is being re-released. I think that shoes and pattens is due to come out this fall. I have only had the chance to barrow this book through interlibrary loan.[ 06-11-2001: Message edited by: Rhys ] -------------------- All the best, Rhys
Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
hauptmann
unregistered
|
posted 06-12-2001 05:26 PM
Rhys,If you can post the image on this page, I will cross reference with the shoes and pattens info. I have all the MoL books. The Livre de la Chasse I have is also the one from the BN in France. I don't have any plates from the Pierpont MS, so maybe you can help us out. Fol. 87 in the BN MS shows closures which might resemble what you're mentioning, and they're pretty clearly hooks and eyes. Maybe they're the same as in your picture.
IP: Logged
|
|
Rhys
Member
Member # 185
|
posted 06-13-2001 04:56 PM
Hi Jeff, I am a little confused in trying to upload the image. So I went out and created a "cookie cutter" web page. Here is the link http://homepages.about.com/rhysmoore/theconflictofcoherency/id2.html Hopefully this will work! (which it does) It is the first image on the left. [ 06-13-2001: Message edited by: Rhys ] -------------------- All the best, Rhys
Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
hauptmann
unregistered
|
posted 06-13-2001 06:45 PM
It's my guess that what you're seeing is likely a fold-over instep (like on thigh high riding boots) perhaps closed with a strap and buckle. The illustration is not very clear on the web, so it's difficult to make a sure determination. I don't think there are any examples of this type of closure in the MoL book. Most of those are a cut instep with a stitched-in tongue which underlaps.I'm not familiar with military desert boots, so I couldn't say if they're similar to this one.
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ned
Member
Member # 170
|
posted 06-19-2001 06:48 PM
Rhys...on your cookie cutter web page you posted above. The guy in the lower left pic on the horse. I made a pair of similar boots. Actually....look at my profile. In the pic in there I'm wearing the boots I made.[ 06-19-2001: Message edited by: Ned ] -------------------- Quid Corone
Registered: Apr 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gwen
Member
Member # 126
|
posted 06-20-2001 02:39 PM
Hey guys-Rather than go to our website and copy Jeff's interpretation of a medieval boot, why don't you start with Marc Carlson's pattern and look at period paintings of thigh high boots as a reference? As a rule, it's always better to go to an original source for info than to copy a copy. Gwen
Registered: Feb 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
hauptmann
unregistered
|
posted 06-20-2001 05:28 PM
Rhys,I make the boots two ways, with buckles and a hook and eye on the instep, or with no closure. The latter relies on spur straps to keep the foldover down. The reason I offer them both ways is this: Rene's "Livre de Tournois" and the "Book of Love" shows the fold over held down only by the spur straps. I have only found scant evidence (mostly in allegorical Flemish paintings) of boots with buckles, so this does not seem typical, though it was probably done. I also think buckles were probably used late in the 15th century because you see them and hook closures in Gaston Phoebus' hunting illos from earlier in the 15th century, only slightly earlier than my replicas are geared for. I figure that most wearers of my boots will not wear spurs (though if they're wearing riding boots at all, they SHOULD be wearing spurs with them), and the fold over is mighty inconvenient without any closure at all. This gives wearers the option of not having to purchase replica spurs, though if you're buying riding boots you should pop for the spurs too... So.... There is very strong evidence for the foldover and reasonable evidence, though less conclusive, for closures on foldovers. I hope that clears things up a bit. [ 06-20-2001: Message edited by: hauptmann ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|