Hi Wolf,I think the kit looks very nice, and from the descripion of what you have or are looking for believable.
I'll limit my commentary at the moment (I'm pressed for time) to the impression itself. I think we (as US reenactors) are on the edge of falling into a trap that has made a travesty of accurate appearance in Late Medieval reenactment in the UK. It is something we can and should avoid.
That trap is to field as units large numbers of heavily armoured footmen wih bills, with perhaps a couple or three bowmen per unit. The overwhelming evidence from documentation for the era is that the most significant numbers or element of any English retinue/army/own millitia is composed of bowmen. The numbers of bowemen in contrast to other types of soldiers can reach as high as a 10-1 ratio, and commonly are 3,5-1.
The rules surrounding UK reenactment societies make the role of he archer less glamerous, and have less outcome on the events they are paricipating in. IN the US, we have the chance to stop what would be an equally false picure of lae Medieval English battles occuring - and we really ought to if we wan any pretence of maintaining a certain level of accuracy in our reenactment.
Your kit would be very good, and work equally well if you topped off the impression with a nice yew (or similar wood) longbow. Even keep the bill - consider it a livery bill and lay it by your side when shooting, to pick it up to engage in the melee.
It's that, or American 15th century groups ought to look into recreating armies with high numbers of melee infantry - perhaps Flemish or Swiss would fill the bill, where they could wear considerable quantities of armour, have thier hand weapons, and still make an overall realistic impression of a fighting unit.