|
Author
|
Topic: Couter Points Question
|
|
|
chef de chambre
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 4
|
posted 11-08-2000 08:51 PM
Hi Alec,I am much more familiar with Italian harness than German, but I will give it a shot. I believe with this form of couter, there are a pair of associated points in the outside of the elbow, but also there would be a strap to secure it where the elbow bends. It is my understanding that the upper cannons are not attached to the couter directly, wich is supposed to give the arm a higher degree of flexibility than it tends to have with an Italian harness. An arming doublet should relieve any buckle problems you are experiencing. I could be dead wrong, and I will deffer my opinion to Jeff when he gets a chance to read this if he is in disagreement. If we had a surviving german arming doublet of mid 15th c. date with points intact, it would answer many questions. Unfortunately no such garment survives pre 16th c. ------------------ Bob R.
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hauptfrau
New Member
Member # 0
|
posted 11-14-2000 05:22 PM
The reason being that there is slack built into a sleeve, in this case the sleeve of an arming doublet, to accomodate the arm bending.I can't address the couter question as I'm not an armourer, but I would caution you to beware this assumption regarding the arming coat. In my world Slack = bulk = poor patterning. If someone's told you the sleeve has to be loose to allow your arm to bend, or that the sleeve can't be stitched into the armhole or you won't be able to lift your arm, you're talking to someone that doesn't know how to pattern a sleeve, *NOT* someone who knows what they're talking about. A proper arming coat sleeve pattern will fit tight on the arm with no excess slack to mess with the fit of the arm harness. A proper sleeve pattern will also allow you free range of motion in the shoulder *without* needing to be left open under the armpit. But I think this is another thread....  Gwen
Registered: A Long Time Ago! | IP: Logged
|
|
|