Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  FireStryker Living History Forum   » History   » Arms & Armour   » Couter Points Question

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Couter Points Question
Alec
New Member
Member # 79

posted 11-08-2000 07:58 PM     Profile for Alec   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I just found this site yesterday and have really enjoyed the topics and quality of the discussion. My compliments. I look forward to sharing in your colective learning.

I'll start with a question about elbows. I have been playing around with a german style 15C couter/elbow cop project. I have raised the thing into a fairly reasonable form -- similar to the couter pictured on the cover of Paddock's "Arms and Armour of a Medeival Knight." My question is how these free floating couters were typically strapped to an arm.

I've seen them mounted with a strap and buckle across the inside of the elbow. Personally never liked that method as the buckle bites into my arm. I've always used a pair of laces across the inside of the elbow that tied through a pair of holes on the outside of the couter. I always wondered whether that meathod was accurate. Finally I've seen reconstructive illustraions showing a pair of points sewn to the elbow of the arming doublet that tied through matching pairs of holes in the couter. The Helmschmied Maxamilian I harness comes to mind. But I wonder whether this setup would have included a similar pair of points on the inside of the couter to prevent it from pivoting off your elbow. I would appreciate any thoughts as to the preferred meathod.

Cheers.


Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
chef de chambre
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 4

posted 11-08-2000 08:51 PM     Profile for chef de chambre   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hi Alec,

I am much more familiar with Italian harness than German, but I will give it a shot. I believe with this form of couter, there are a pair of associated points in the outside of the elbow, but also there would be a strap to secure it where the elbow bends. It is my understanding that the upper cannons are not attached to the couter directly, wich is supposed to give the arm a higher degree of flexibility than it tends to have with an Italian harness. An arming doublet should relieve any buckle problems you are experiencing.

I could be dead wrong, and I will deffer my opinion to Jeff when he gets a chance to read this if he is in disagreement. If we had a surviving german arming doublet of mid 15th c. date with points intact, it would answer many questions. Unfortunately no such garment survives pre 16th c.

------------------
Bob R.


Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged
Alec
New Member
Member # 79

posted 11-13-2000 08:12 PM     Profile for Alec   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Bob,

Thank you for your reply. I suspect that you are right about the strap. Most of the original couters that I've seen in person or in a phote seem to have the strap across the inside bend of the elbow -- though I wonder to what extent the holes to mount those straps were added by later restorations or display efforts for that armour.

Terminology question. I've always used the term point to mean the pair of holes in the metal or other thing being held -- i.e. two holes make a point. Is that the right usage of the term? When you say pair of points, do you mean two holes or four? Boy, is that a pedantic question. You don't happen to have any thoughts on the number of angels that fit on the head of a pin.


Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
chef de chambre
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 4

posted 11-13-2000 09:03 PM     Profile for chef de chambre   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hi Alec,

I believe the terminology is - points: a lace that passes through a pair of holes in a garment so that each end protruded equidistant from the garment. When I use pair of points, that means two sets of laces - I would refer you to David Edge & John Miles Paddock's work "Arms & Armour of the Medieval Knight. On pg 116 there is the funeral effigy of Sir Robert Harcourt KG who died in 1471. He is wearing what I see as a typicaly English harness - made in Flanders to the English tast (note how high the tassets are set on the faulds). If you look at his couters, yopu will see a two sets on points securing them , one above and one below the bend of the arm. That is what I m=ean by a pair of points. On some effigies, onl;y one set of points secures the couters - se pg 114 same book.

For a good Medieval answer to the second question - "As many as God wants, in his infinite wisdom and Mercy!" It is my modern answer too.

------------------
Bob R.


Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged
Alec
New Member
Member # 79

posted 11-14-2000 05:05 PM     Profile for Alec   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Thank you for the discussion on points. "point" = lace makes perfect sense.

I'll check out the effigy you refer to again when I get home tonight. My inclination has always been to interpret this as points on the side of the arm rather than in line with the elbow. The reason being that there is slack built into a sleeve, in this case teh sleve of an arming doublet, to accomodate the arm bending. This might mean the couter would have too much play when the arm is strait. But this is just a hunch on my part.


Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
hauptfrau
New Member
Member # 0

posted 11-14-2000 05:22 PM     Profile for hauptfrau     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The reason being that there is slack built into a sleeve, in this case the sleeve of an arming doublet, to accomodate the arm bending.

I can't address the couter question as I'm not an armourer, but I would caution you to beware this assumption regarding the arming coat.

In my world Slack = bulk = poor patterning.

If someone's told you the sleeve has to be loose to allow your arm to bend, or that the sleeve can't be stitched into the armhole or you won't be able to lift your arm, you're talking to someone that doesn't know how to pattern a sleeve, *NOT* someone who knows what they're talking about.

A proper arming coat sleeve pattern will fit tight on the arm with no excess slack to mess with the fit of the arm harness. A proper sleeve pattern will also allow you free range of motion in the shoulder *without* needing to be left open under the armpit.

But I think this is another thread....

Gwen


Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | Wolfe Argent Living History

Copyright © 2000-2009 Wolfe Argent Living History. All Rights reserved under International Copyright Conventions. No part of this website may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission of the content providers. Individual rights remain with the owners of the posted material.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.01