Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  FireStryker Living History Forum   » History   » Medieval Lifestyles, Activities, and Equipment   » question

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: question
mingbop
New Member
Member # 837

posted 07-05-2005 04:48 AM     Profile for mingbop   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
what do you think life in a castle was really like ...was it cold & uncomfortable, with damp and TB ? or did they make things generally ok ? Because stone is a really cold environment in winter, esp scottish ones--and so many castles are built by the sea with the icy winds & damp air & fog. I walk around them and think ohhh poor souls, how miserable it must have been, but then maybe I'm wrong.Somebody please tell me how they made themselves cosy?
Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fire Stryker
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 2

posted 07-05-2005 09:02 AM     Profile for Fire Stryker   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I can't answer for actually living in one or having visited an honest to goodness one since we don't really have them in the US. The closet I've come is one of the stone harbor forts in Boston, Massachusetts.

For some general reading, may I suggest Life in a Medieval Castle by Joseph Gies might give you an insight into it. It deals primarily with castles in the UK.

I think someone from the UK, might have been Dave, said that castles could be quite cool even in the summer.

To make themselves "cozy", the folks would dress for the occasion. Most likely layered clothing, mostly wool.

Castle floors might have carpets similar to the Oriental carpets we see or the walls might be adorned with tapestries. Most probably had shutters for the windows. I doubt people would leave their homes open to the elements. In a word...fireplaces.


Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged
mingbop
New Member
Member # 837

posted 07-05-2005 10:34 AM     Profile for mingbop   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
ok ta for that. I did wonder about the windows,--shutters make sense ! My house is stone and I'm in the hills, and I know how cold stone is...our fire is seldom out. Can anybody tell me if they knitted with wool or just wove it ?
Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fire Stryker
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 2

posted 07-05-2005 10:45 AM     Profile for Fire Stryker   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I think knitted vs. woven depends on the time period and location.

Others will have to answer this one. It is not an area that I research.

--------------------

ad finem fidelis


Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged
Gwen
Member
Member # 126

posted 07-05-2005 11:21 AM     Profile for Gwen   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Depends on what you call "knitting". The Romans, Vikings and other early people used an interlocking looped thread technique called "naalbinding". Knitting as we know it with 2 or more needles seems to have been around here and there after about the 12th C., and expanded significantly in the 15th C. Knitting doesn't really seem to have come into its own until the mid-late 16th C.

If you're wondering about knitted foot/leg coverings, we have evidence of Early Danish naalbind socks, and Elizabethan stockings. In the interval it seems that leg coverings for both men and women were made of bias-cut woven wool.

There's a Ciba article about knitting and another about stockings, both of which give a fairly thorough overview of the topic. Alternatively Shire Books has a volume on framework knitting available- http://www.shirebooks.co.uk/Textile/textile-bl.htm#frakni

Gwen


Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged
mingbop
New Member
Member # 837

posted 07-05-2005 12:08 PM     Profile for mingbop   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
oh gwen that's lovely. thank you pet.
Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
K S-W
New Member
Member # 672

posted 07-05-2005 01:52 PM     Profile for K S-W   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hi Mingbop--
The comfort level of the castle depended on the climate and the wealth of the builder, as well as local custom.
On a recent trip to Ireland, I saw that many of the castles -- much like the Scottish tower-house style -- were heated by a few fireplaces placed on outside walls. Some also had recessed nooks in the walls beside the chimneys on higher floors -- favored places to sit on a cold night. Charcoal or log braziers in the middle of the room were another source of heat.

In other cases, Chepstow is an example, there is evidence of a form of forced hot air through vents in the wall to the main rooms, though not to all locations in the castle, as I understand it.

For pure conjecture, I have heard of a home in Gstaad (I think) which was built over a floor restored from Roman times, through which hot water is pumped from a (downstairs?) furnace. Though not in a castle, at least this form of radiant heating was known in Europe well before the Middle Ages. We can only hypothesize as to its later applications....
--Kent


Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Woodcrafter
Member
Member # 197

posted 07-10-2005 12:59 PM     Profile for Woodcrafter   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
There is no black and white answer to your question. Rather we must consider the conditions of use. A hall packed with people and with a fire is going to be pretty warm. That was the intended use. Simon (the son) de Montfort gathered his reserve troops at Kenilworth. However as the summer was so hot, most of the troops elected to camp outside the castle and in the nearby village. Edward forced marched and destroyed them.

By the early 14thc some castles were becoming crown prisons like the works at York. Manor houses were the norm and Bodium was built on a license to crenelate, which normally means fortify a manor, not scratch build a castle. However there is a marked difference in how it was laid out as apposed to the hall castles of centuries past.

The castle most people think of was intended to house alot of people safely. Body heat in an enclosed space accounts for alot which could be why some windows were only shuttered. Most rooms that began to be set aside for personal living in the 13thc are fitted with fireplaces. This arrangement is similar to an 18thc settler's stone or log house. And by personal living, I mean the entire family (owner) would be present.

While in Great Britain, I visited many castles. The most upsetting was Knaresborough Castle, only because of what the attendant was instructed to tell visitors. She told me that the castle was very cold and damp, to the point that water would run down the stairs like a water fall when it rained! I took a quick look and was forced to point out that the roof and most of the upper floor had gone completely, leaving the stairs open to the weather, not to mention there was no fire and we were the only two in the room...

--------------------

Woodcrafter
14th c. Woodworking


Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | Wolfe Argent Living History

Copyright © 2000-2009 Wolfe Argent Living History. All Rights reserved under International Copyright Conventions. No part of this website may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission of the content providers. Individual rights remain with the owners of the posted material.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.01