|
Author
|
Topic: Tudor Saddle
|
|
|
hauptmann
unregistered
|
posted 11-20-2001 12:08 AM
Jenn,Thanks for the pic. Nice detail. What do they have it dated at??
IP: Logged
|
|
Rodric
Member
Member # 227
|
posted 11-20-2001 07:20 AM
I don't believe it, it's one of those new fangled half breed Aussie stock saddles crossed with a western. Just about every man and his dog has got one of these down my way. Seriously though, that is exactly what it looks like. The saddler that made my war saddle makes pretty well nothing else but these half breeds. -------------------- Cheers Rod Sweat more in Training. Bleed Less in War.
Registered: Oct 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
NEIL G
Member
Member # 187
|
posted 11-20-2001 07:29 AM
Hi;Either this is the example in the museum of london, or they have a very similar example. My memory of the MoL one is that it's more complete and doesn't have such a prominent horn, but I don't gaurantee my memory on those points. Does the photo credit give any clues? BTW - the Wallace collection has just finished restoring a German war saddle of 1549. Neil
Registered: Jun 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
Fire Stryker
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 2
|
posted 11-20-2001 07:31 AM
Hi Rodric, Chef and I just received (2) of the "hornless" variety Australian stock saddles for our whopping big draft crosses. As Chef says, "They look spiff!"  Jeff, I am currently looking for a specific date in the book I have. I have looked at the photo credits and have come up empty handed. Because of the shape of the saddle, I think it is 15th c or early 16th. The Tudor reign began with Henry VII in 1485 *growl*, but I think that it looks similar to a lot of those found in contemporary artwork throughout the 15th c. and bare a passing resemblance to the horn saddles or the early part of that century. I will post any further info I get on this Southwark find. [ 11-21-2001: Message edited by: Fire Stryker ]
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
Fire Stryker
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 2
|
posted 11-20-2001 09:23 AM
Hi Neil,We must have performed a simultaneous post. I didn't see your commentary before. I believe that this saddle is in the materials held by the Saddler's Hall. I have not seen the one in the MoL. Is it in the finds book or are you talking an actual current display? Do you have a pic? Jeff, I have submitted an inquery to see if I can get more info. Will keep everyone up to date. Jenn [ 11-20-2001: Message edited by: Fire Stryker ]
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
NEIL G
Member
Member # 187
|
posted 11-20-2001 10:19 AM
Nor I yours, M'lady;The saddle in the MoL is on display in the Tudor/Stuart section, or at least it was last time I was there. If I recall correctly (usual caveats about memory apply) it was recovered from some waterlogged context in an innyard, and was very sketchily dated as late tudor. I'm not aware of it being published anywhere, but to be honest it was a little late for me to have really looked. I can try for a photo next time I'm there, but it won't be for a while, and I don't gaurantee results as I'll be shooting through glass. Neil
Registered: Jun 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
Fire Stryker
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 2
|
posted 11-20-2001 11:07 AM
Hi Neil,You are correct. I just received a response back from Mr. Martin, Clerk of the Worshipful Company of Saddlers. He informed me that the saddle was not in the Company's holdings but was in fact, the last he knew, in the collection of the MoL. He has no other data on the saddle. Jenn FYI to all: I reduced the image size so that it would quit pushing the browser window to the point of no return.  [ 11-20-2001: Message edited by: Fire Stryker ]
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|