|
Author
|
Topic: Linen Fabric Weights
|
Friedrich
Member
Member # 40
|
posted 10-09-2002 11:38 PM
I have a research question for the fabric-ly inclined on the forum.From your experience and preferences, what weights of linen do you recommend for various 15thC garments? IE: Summer weight shirt: Winter weight shirt: Doublet liner: Livery liner: Helmet liner: Table napkins: The choices, cloth weights in oz.'s 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 or more!
What would you use???
Registered: Jul 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
chef de chambre
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 4
|
posted 10-10-2002 05:09 PM
Jenn here posing as Chef.  How about historic thread counts? I have MoL Textiles book, but their linen topic is somewhat short. They discuss a few finds dating from the 13th - 15th centuries. The thread count per cm is 22/22 (warp/weft); that makes it what about 55 per inch? Are there higher counts for linen. I have been looking via the internet, but this is a new area for me. Sorry Friedrich, not trying to derail your thread, it seemed to be in line with your initial question. Jenn
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
Friedrich
Member
Member # 40
|
posted 10-10-2002 09:05 PM
Jenn,My question was addressing the same questions Alienor has for web purchasing. But understanding the thread count is also important as it refers to how fine the fabric is. So I amend the question. Weight in oz (or gram) is important. But if the knowledgeable and so inclined could add a threadcount or vague "fineness" comment (how fine or course is the fabric), that would immensely add to the discussion! FvH
Registered: Jul 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
Marianne
Member
Member # 223
|
posted 10-16-2002 10:03 AM
quote: Originally posted by Friedrich: The choices, cloth weights in oz.'s 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 or more!What would you use???
I've little experience of my own to share but I found the following guidelines useful (see below). They were sent in to another mailing list I'm on by the lady at www.reconstructinghistory.com. --- --- --- --- --- 3.5 oz/yd Commonly referred to as "handkerchief weight". Great for chemises. 5.2 oz/yd 5.5 oz/yd 5.9 oz/yd "Dress weight". It has enough drape for a cotehardie to look lovely. But still, the lighter colours are a little less than opaque. 7.4 oz/yd VERY coarse. I'm using it for field garb for my betrothed. It is heavy, and visibly coarse. It feels nice, but it looks very slubby. But you wouldn't see through it, that's for sure! I would buy 3.5 oz for both veils and underdress. Unless a great portion of the underdress will be seen, then I would go for 5.5 oz. Both white, of course.
I wouldn't make hosen out of linen because it doesn't have enough give, even on the bias. But if I *had* to, I would make them out of 7.4 oz. But I would rather make them out of wool (wash it well in hot water and it won't itch). --- --- --- --- --- Myself I prefer to use wool for outer garments and I'm just now importing some linen so I finally learn what 3.5oz linen looks like. I have little idea of the accurate fineness, but my understanding is that it was finer than the "rustic" look so common nowadays, so if given a chance I'd go with the finest, smoothest weave I could find unless I intended to do a "poverty look". Hope that helps! I would love to have a more technical answer, too. Marianne
Registered: Sep 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
chef de chambre
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 4
|
posted 10-16-2002 10:49 AM
Hi Marianne, quote: Myself I prefer to use wool for outer garments and I'm just now importing some linen so I finally learn what 3.5oz linen looks like.
Absolutely. That said, the things Friedrich asked about are shirts and liners for garments, which as far as we know were always properly were made of linen, hemp, satin, or silk.  -------------------- Bob R.
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
Gwen
Member
Member # 126
|
posted 10-16-2002 10:56 AM
I have nothing constructive to add here since I never buy linen by mail by weight, only in person by feel.That having been said, I'd like to point out that "satin" is a weave, not a fibre. Additionally, "linen" can be applied to any fabric made from plant fibres, therefore there one finds hemp linen, flax linen, nettlecloth linen, and ramie linen. Gwen
Registered: Feb 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Marianne
Member
Member # 223
|
posted 10-23-2002 08:35 AM
Hi! quote: Originally posted by chef de chambre: Absolutely. That said, the things Friedrich asked about are shirts and liners for garments, which as far as we know were always properly were made of linen, hemp, satin, or silk. [/B]
Sure! I made that comment because of the text I quoted was of course out of its original context, and mentioned using linen for a cotehardie, for example. On the other hand... you got my interest up by including silk in the list of fibres for undergarments. Any idea how common that was? My particular interest is late 15th c., southern half of Europe but I'll happily take any information. Best regards, Marianne
Registered: Sep 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|